30 October, 2006

Dixie issues

Last week The Dixie Chicks scored big on the PR front as Producers, The Weinstein Co. claimed NBC and CW refused to airs an ad campaign for the upcoming documentary ‘Shut Up and Sing’. You may remember last year, when the Dixie Chicks received a universal panning for making a saying they were ‘Embarrassed’ Bush was from Texas. CW refutes the fact saying that TWC didn’t put in an order for ad space. This was seemingly confirmed by NBC. The Backlash saw their core fan base within the country listening community, a population with whom they have always had a tenuous relationship, all but vanish amidst a campaign run by the Free Republic Group.  

Variety broke the story last week saying that in addition to NBC, “they hadn’t heard back yet from the commercial clearance departments at ABC, CBS and Fox”.
The Variety article continues…
According to the Weinstein Co., NBC's commercial clearance department said in writing that it "cannot accept these spots as they are disparaging to President Bush."
TWC also quoted a rep from the CW as saying it had concerns that "we do not have appropriate programming in which to schedule this spot."

Matt Drudge Chimed in early on with a quote from Harvey himself:

“It’s a sad commentary about the level of fear in our society that a movie about a group of courageous entertainers who were blacklisted for exercising their right of free speech is now itself being blacklisted by corporate America. The idea that anyone should be penalized for criticizing the president is sad and profoundly un-American.”

TWC is apparently also considering legal action. I somehow think that after this publicity they should be thanking NBC!

If you’re a fan of the Chick bookmark the fan blog site from the film Shut Up and Post.

My take is the Weinstein’s are absolute PR scholars. Need to make hype? Make the most of a controversial film? There’s no one better….

Brightcove embedded content

28 October, 2006

How to Blue Screen Properly

HD4Indies and FresHDV have already covered this article from General Specialist, but it is a good run down of how to do blue screen and green screen shoots properly! Give this a read and keep it as reference because it is a pain in the ass reshooting anything let alone in a studio.

27 October, 2006

UCSB Faculty Makes For An Interesting Read

Speaking of Books…
At the moment I am debating going back to school part time.
This made me think about my undergrad, which was at UCSB in what I think is a great place for film theory, history and analysis. One of the best around in fact. They have no real production side although Dana Driskel does what he can with limited resources. If your after the why rather than the how, UCSB is great. I thought I might take a moment to list some of the interesting work that has come from my teachers at Uni.

Constance Penley
Professor of Film and Media Studies, Director of the Center for Film, Television and New Media
Specializations: Film History & Theory, Media Studies, Feminist Theory, Science & Technology Studies, and Contemporary Art
Books
NASA/Trek: Popular Science and Sex in America

Lisa Parks
Associate Professor of Film and Media Studies
Specializations: Global Media, Broadcast History, Cultural Studies
Books
Planet TV: A Global Television Reader
Cultures in Orbit: Satellites and the Televisual (Console-ing Passions)

Anna Everett
Professor of Film and Media Studies, Chair of Film and Media Studies
Specializations: Film and Television History and Theory, Black Film, Digital Media Technologies.
Returning the Gaze: A Genealogy of Black Film Criticism, 1909-1949
New Media: Practices of Digitextuality (AFI Film Readers)
New Media: Practices of Digitextuality (AFI Film Readers)

Edward Branigan
Professor of Film and Media Studies,
Director of Graduate Studies,
Graduate Advisor
Specializations: Classical Film Theory, Aesthetics, Narrative, Point-of-View
Narrative Comprehension and Film (Sightlines)
Projecting a Camera

HDto35 Store Launch!

Finally,

If you fancy supporting this site, I have started the HDto35 Store! It is UK based and I have to look into how to set one up in the States as well.  But if you want to get anything like film books, have a look. I also have featured recommendations!


David Bordwell's Blog

Today I stumbled across David Bordwell and Kristen Thompson’s blog which started up recently. Back in my Film Studies Days Thompson and Bordwell were a staple. Both teach out of the University  of Wisconsin – Madison. Generally regarded as the Don’s of Film Studies, I hope this blog will prove a great insight into two of the foremost scholars in film analysis.

P.S. Narration in the Fiction Film still looms over me from the shelf in my lounge!

Greenpeace Get The Boot From Apple Expo London

Lots of things waiting to be written about….


Apple Insider and MacNN are reporting on the Mac expo here in London, where Greenpeace have been forced to close their stand after complaints. MacNN takes the comments from Greenpeace:

"This reaction is totally over-the-top" said Iza Kruszewska, Greenpeace International campaigner at the expo. "Apple refuses to address our criticisms on their products, both for the recycling and for the use of harmful chemicals. Instead of hiding their head in the sand, Apple should be a world leader in the greening of the electronics industry, not lagging behind," Kruszewska added.

Green peace are not know for their restraint. Macworld takes Apples’ perspective:
According to Bob Denton, Event Director, the removal of Greenpeace had nothing to do its message or the materials being handed out. Bob said: “They paid money and had the right to be at the show.”The problem started when a group of 12 Greenpeace activists gathered outside the show entrance and started handing out flyers and apples to attendees. Bob Denton said: “We want people to be cool and calm as they enter the show”.
He explained to the Greenpeace organisers that it would be acceptable for two activists to stand by the stairs inside the show and hand out flyers, but the event management would not allow a gathering outside the main door.
There then followed a number of complaints about the behaviour of Greenpeace activists from four visitors and five exhibitors, one of which was Apple. Allegedly, Greenpeace attendees were invading other stands for mock photo shoots and replacing other exhibitors’ promotional material with their own.
The problem came to a head when one woman complained that they had placed an apple in her child’s pram and were taking photographs of him without her permission.
Bob Denton told Macworld: “I explained to them that I had the right to eject them but that wouldn’t happen if they showed reason.” However, later in the day, “two more visitors and two more exhibitors complained” and he ejected the activists under clause 13 of the terms and conditions that Greenpeace signed.

From the Greenpeace site:
We love Apple. Apple knows more about "clean" design than anybody, right? So why do Macs, iPods, iBooks and the rest of their product range contain hazardous substances that other companies have abandoned? A cutting edge company shouldn't be cutting lives short by exposing children in China and India to dangerous chemicals. That's why we Apple fans need to demand a new, cool product: a greener Apple.

24 October, 2006

No More Star Wars!

High Definition Magazine and TV Predictions have picked up a story from Variety where Geoegey Boy has broken a long love hate relationship with the movie industry. George says the future is TV!!! Film is dead. The industry is too risk heavy and really with HD you can now create high quality content for the home market.
"... film's future will be small budget movies distributed over the Internet and viewed in Home Theaters equipped with high-def sets"."We don't want to make movies. We're about to get into television. As far as Lucasfilm is concerned, we've moved away from the feature-film thing because it's too expensive and it's too risky," Lucas said.

For me, Lucas is a poser. The evolution of the industry is integration mass consumption through a variety of mediums and a long tail. People will continue to enjoy collective viewing, but with handhelds, PVRs, Internet TV distribution, mass adoption of home cinemas and HDTV, there is an ever increasing blurring of the lines. True, fewer Big Budget Pictures will be made, and studios are scaling back production operations, however, Hollywood still spends 30 Million on marketing a film properly. Clever companies are looking at multifaceted approaches.

World Bank Investing In Content Creation

According to a Digit article the world bank is gearing up to invest heavily in content creation and the creative industry as this in their view is the next boom sector.  This news follows on from stories of increasing interests on the part of hedge funds in film producing and cutting deals with producers rather than studios. Brightcove. Youtube. Apple iTunes Store selling movies. We are truly in an age where technical innovation is driving consumer/viewer habit and inturn market investment.  I good time to be in content creation finance!
Cha…….. Ching

Final Touch Prediction

Ok here are my predictions now that the dust has settled on the Silicon Color thing. Still no news from anyone.

I had originally thought that Apple will combine Shake and FT. I think this idea has a lot of promise, but maybe that is too much to ask by NAB. Instead I think we will see the following:

Final Touch Ver. 2.1.7 or whichever the next is, will be release in November and support Intel Macs. Apple doesn’t want to stifle its intel switch in any way. This will be a quiet switch and the product will be branded Apple Final Touch.

Final Touch Ver 3 will be released at NAB with Full Fan Fare as Apple Final Touch Pro. A stand alone application for grading. There will be one app that does all resolutions SD to 2K. It will be priced between $6 - $10K.  They will take out the shake node bit, and depending on Shake-like product releases will have send to options for FCP and Other Apps. The FCP integration will unfortunately be based on xml rather than native project files.

This is rumour, but I am putting my neck out with this scenario….
We shall wait and see ay!

Apple Are Having a Rare London Info/Training Day

Apple is running a free day session in west London to learn about Photos Film and Music editing on a mac. Check it out here!

Friday November 17thLondon Hilton Metropole225 Edgware RoadLondonW2 1JU

Photography Session
Join us for an in-depth look at Aperture 1.5, the first all-in-one post-production tool for photographers. Built from the ground up for serious photographers, Aperture 1.5 offers an advanced RAW workflow, powerful compare and select tools, non-destructive image processing, and versatile printing and publishing.
Join the Apple photography team as they share their favourite supercharged tips, tricks and hidden secrets. Learn how to push Aperture 1.5 to the limits, discover how it integrates with the latest offerings from Canon, and pick up a few fun tidbits along the way.
This session is aimed at professional photographers as well as students, teachers and advanced hobbyists.
Video Session
This free seminar offers a unique opportunity to elevate your knowledge on some of the latest production tools in the video industry, including the new Mac Pro and Apple’s Final Cut Studio software suite.
Join us and discover how Apple’s pro digital production software gives you the power to create and deliver more effectively. Experience the connectivity between a wide range of video cameras, and find out how easily you can integrate graphics, audio and special effects — all from within the timeline.
Whether you’re a major league broadcaster looking for more creative agility or a small house seeking to elevate production values, discover how Final Cut Studio can play a leading role in your production.
Music Session
Audio professionals demand a solution that offers advanced features capable of handling any job. Logic Pro 7 — the industry-leading application for music creation and audio production — is that solution.
Logic Pro 7 provides a comprehensive collection of music creation tools — world class sequencing, real-time MIDI support, advanced notation, Apple Loop and QuickTime support, comprehensive audio editing, complete support for native audio hardware, and a vast array of sound generation instruments as well as over 70 plug-ins that meet every need from tracking to editing to mixing to mastering.
This session is aimed at audio programmers, producers, musicians, engineers and mixers.

23 October, 2006

BBC Audience Festival: Dumbing Up For Younger Audiences

Working at the BBC has some definite advantages. The other week I got to attend one of the sessions from the first ever audience festival intended to examine the role and importance of audiences in programme making. The session was Dumbing up for Younger Audiences. The panel of speakers included
Moderator Julian Bellamy (JB) -Controller BBC 3
Susan Hickson (SH) –writer/creator 2 Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps
Jamie Isaacs (JI) -Creative Director of 20/20 makers of Brat Camp and Bad Lads Army
Tim Hinks (TH) -Chief Creative Officer Endemol, makers of Big Brother, 9 out of 10 Cats etc.

Here are my paraphrased notes from the session:
JB - Context – What are the characteristics of younger audiences?
SH – We never looked directly at audiences, but rather I relied on personal experiences to build characters
JH – Brat Camp required high octane action and attitude, the youth audience demends you grab them quickly.
TH – Demographics are more for broadcasters, as a programme maker if you like the show, that will come off in it and to the audience.
SH – Two Pints has gotten faster with each series.

JB – How do you make an idea?
TH – We use an advertising model which is market lead
TH – We use interns who watch TV all day and think of ideas, but they burn out quickly and funnel off to other aspects of the business. Sometimes this works, sometimes it doesn’t. I would like now to publicly apologies for Space Cadets!
SH- I use writers who know nothing about TV
JB- It seems rather than research audiences, you employ them.
TH – when you see programme makers doing mass audience research, it usually means the wolves are at the door and it’s about whether to cancel.
JI – We employ TV Professionals. Our development team takes ideas from the execs. It is very top down through exec collaboration with commissioners.

Casting and Characters:
TH – Big Brother who knew George Galloway was going to act as he did?
JB – Is there a secret to great casting?
TH – Big Pockets buys big casts.
TH – For Big Bro 1 we just wanted to make sure the people would talk in an empty room, they were social. But then the group seemed too wild, so we needed a person to bring calm. Enter Nick Bateman.
JI – for Brat Camp and Bad Lads we are looking for people with risk and excitement. Those up against the edge of what is acceptable, but not showboaters. But there is always a danger of going too far, so we spend 5x as long casting as shooting. Use multiple interviews and trust your gut.
We also were looking for characters we could instantly brand (label) Brat Camp has 6 characters w/ different problems. The individual stories need to be latched onto the audience quicker.
SN – Good looking people = Good casting. The audience must be pleased by what they see.
JI – Funny enough, Bad Lads is the same way. Some guys just had too bad teeth to be let on TV.
JI – Also, casting young people. People see young people and root for them to change. Old people are at fault if they haven’t sorted themselves out by now. They should be old enough to look after themselves.
TH –Although young people can enjoy characters of all ages. The storytelling has to be strong.
People like instant gratification. Deal or no Deal is good because of the drama throughout.
Originally Big Brother show was based on the style of Pet Rescue, with A&B Stories running throughout each show.

JB How could the BBC do better with its younger audiences.
TH- BBC is the only place I would never take Big Brother. They would muck it up, by being too afraid. The show is still very cutting edge. The BBC is obsessed with 360 Commissioning to gain a younger audience, but this interest in the young comes off as creepy.
BBC3 is like your dad throwing you a party! Some fun things but in a grown up stuffy way. The BBC sits oddly with young people.
JB – Does the BBC Adopt a parental tone?
JI –Wouldn’t stop us from bringing a show to the Beeb.
TH –Fame Academy was a popular show, but the BBC was embarrassed of it, and that ultimately killed it.

Youtube threat & Web
SN –It is a big threat.
JI – It can inform TV
TH – The worst thing is for TV to just say hmmm maybe we should use loads of UGC in our shows.
SN - Broadcasters need to get more interactivity
TH –Big brother has seen success from video and mobile downloads


KEY POINTS:
Trust you instinct when making a show for a younger audience.
Leave the audience analysis to the commissioners.
Both models work. Top down and relying on young peoples ideas.
It is easier to hire the audience.
The best characters come as a surprise. Today’s characters need to be able to establish themselves quickly and be good looking.
The BBC hasn’t figured out how to address young audiences.
New Media is both an opportunity and a threat.

MY 2 Cents:

The session was good and I was happy to hear some of the top British talent in domestic TV. I think that audience connection does have to be organic, but there are too many formulaic shows on the box. Regardless of whether programme makers do audience research, they sure pay attention when there is a success, and copy it to death. It is the same in the movie business. This I think is where a big threat by the internet comes in. Producers of internet TV will, for the foreseeable future be able to experiment and TV producers will follow the internet successes. Perhaps this will open the door to new formats.  

With audiences it is nice to hear that the professionals get surprised by character successes. You cant always predict what people will respond to.

The bit about the BBC makes sense. CBebees is great for kids, but the corporation loses the plot when trying to do teen & 20’s. Probably a direct result of the culture in the halls. It is much more grad school than high school.

All in all it was a great day and I am looking forward to future events.

20 October, 2006

Apple Aquires Silicon Color. We Nervously Wait to Hear What Is Planned

Ok Again, I have been bogged down by other work. Why I insist on earning money I will never know. So I had three days off the blog, but like that hit that keeps calling you back for more I have been lured back to posting. I will start with what I think is one of the most interesting developments lately, the acquisition by Apple of Silicon Color. Mike Curtis has the most comprehensive coverage of the matter with Fresh DV picking the story up too.
So, I will try to refrain from covering similar ground.  

Basically, what I will say is that I will be hugely disappointed if Apple doesn’t turn this around into a positive. If the product is abandoned and all the effort I have seen various companies put into integrating a product with such potential, will be for nothing. I am not going to speculate. I will just hope that an effective solution is brought forward that meets the growing needs of such facilities.

16 October, 2006

Producers Team Up With Fund Managers and Leave Studios With Distribution In A Win Win Win Businesss Model

Over the weekend, the NY Times ran an article covering the growing trend in Film Producers soliciting financing through Hedge Funds rather than Studios.  Apparently this is a business model which suits all parties, but is shifting the balance of power in content direction. Producers make lots more cash and have more creative control. Hedge funds get increased control and choice of projects they want to finance. Studios lose creative control and some revenue channels, but due to a shifting market they can only afford to make a certain amount of films but their distribution network demands higher volume, so this model fits their needs if not desires.

This style of movie financing has been driven by necessity. Studios have been forced to trim their slates because of higher costs, but they still need a steady stream of movies to distribute. In turn, producers need financing, because the studios are backing fewer films. And cash-rich financial institutions are looking for places to invest, hoping to earn double-digit returns while limiting their exposure to the fluctuations of the stock market.

Instant Karma Response

UPDATE: From the posting: "Saving The Environment Or How To Buy Off Your Guilt"
The folks at Instant Karma Films responded with the following:

Glad to see someone is paying attention. Our motivation on a conscious level is purely genuine and comes from a lifetime of conservation efforts. Being involved in environmental and social issues has always been an important and driving factor in my personal and business life. The ideals we have incorporated into Instant Karma Films are simply an extension of our daily lives and how we try to make a difference. From driving a hybrid vehicle, to minimizing use of electrical appliances, to recycling everything, and soon going totally solar powered at home and hopefully at the office in the future. On a subconscious level you may be right about the guilt. But that only comes from living in a world where the choices are not always easy or available to make them the right choices. So while there is probably a certain percentage of guilt involved in our donations to offset our carbon, it doesn't involve the level of guilt you describe in relation to slave labour. We are committed to environmental and social responsibility and hope that our efforts will help shape a new and more climate friendly approach to the production industry. I only wish that the TV commercial trade publications such as Shoot Magazine would find our issues more newsworthy and help bring an awareness to the production community here in the US.

My 2 cents:
I still feel we live in a world where little is done compared to what is warranted. However, I give Instant Karma Props for a first step in proliferating the practice of carbon offset productions. Our industry is disappointing on the whole and my employer is as bad as they come. Here at BBC Resources we have thousands of staff and clients all dinking individual bottles and cans of various drinks every day and not a single one is recycled. Whats worse all coffees are served in paper cups! Paper cups with plastic lids at work. Fuck off. That is just wrong. In my new house I started a really good effort to recycle anything I can and my god it is cringe worthy to watch the stuff be chucked here at work.
Perhaps I was a bit ‘extremist’ in my comments likening environmental damage to slave labour, but the point was made that it is not enough to offset our wrongs but rather change the practises that create them. Instant Karma’s comments illuminate some of the practises business can easily introduce to be more economical with our impact on the planet.
I challenge facilities as well to look at ways post production can be done in an environmentally friendly way.

  • Tapeless work environment

  • Video files for producers rather than DVD’s & VHS’s

  • Paperless environment (why do we still need paper job sheets)

  • Solar energy Panels (Most facilities have roofs

  • Insulation measures

There are loads of others feel free to leave comments with your ideas.  Again props to Instant Karma for moving things in the right direction.  We could all use a bit of the guilt that moves them to action.



12 October, 2006

You Cant Help But Smirk

Even in times of International crisis World of Wonder can bring a smile to my face with the likes of this pic of a certain hotel heiress with her new bit of the moment.

BBC Gov's Plans For Interactivity

BBC Governors have announced today their decision to restart the period for representations on the BBC's application for approval of new on-demand services, including BBC iPlayer, and published supplementary information about the proposition.

All this is according to a press release on the BBC’s site.  For further information, you can see the interactive plans the directors have put forth.

Over the last eighteen months the BBC has conducted a number of trials to assess audience demand for new on-demand offerings. Trial initiatives included the Integrated Media Player, TV+1, radio downloads, video on demand on cable and Homechoice and mobile coverage of major events. Having analysed the consumer research from these trials, BBC Management wishes to launch a number of new, complementary on-demand propositions. These proposals involve a substantial broadening of the current scope of existing offerings and an enhancement of their functionality. BBC Management believes this package represents an appropriate response to current and projected audience demand and fits with the BBC’s strategy to deliver public value in the transition to digital.

The main interactivity features are:

· Seven day TV catch-up over the internet
· Seven day TV catch-up over cable
· Simulcast TV over the internet
· Non-DRM audio downloads over the internet

Saving The Environment Or How To Buy Off Your Guilt

Shots is reporting that Instant Karma Films have produced the first ever carbon neutral commercial. The spot is for Maybelline New York and stars Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon actress Zhang Ziyi. The shoot was done in Shanghai and the production company dontated to carbon fund.org and ‘sponsored the planting of 1000 trees across America the carbon produced during filming’.

CSR Wire’s coverage continues the story saying, ‘The trees are planted through American Forests, the nation's oldest nonprofit citizens' conservation organization and a world leader in planting trees for environmental restoration.’

"We think it is about making the right choices were you can and when you can't you offset our carbon output by donating to organizations such as Carbonfund.org and American Forests who are working to reduce climate change through their environmental programs" said Tanya Farkas, Instant Karma Films' president. She continued "So, if we can encourage others in the industry to start with the first step and offset their carbon output that is a great start."

What do I think? I am torn. There are great advantages to this approach. Obviously, there are a lot of benefits to offsetting carbon and planting trees, but I can’t for the life of me think of why there aren’t more efforts to change the way we operate our businesses. It is a very, do what you like, just donate money and it will be fine. Lets say Apple computers uses slave labour in Asia to produce its computers (not too unbelievable) but if they offset the impact by donating large corporate sized sums of cash to Unicef it surely makes it ok. Right? This is a dangerous philosophy that allows companies to continue their business practices whether they are destructive or not and buy pro-planet PR as well as a clear conscience. I don’t know anything about the practices of Instant Karma Films. From their site, they do appear to be a very conscientious company. What I would look to see in an article about an environmentally friendly production is not that they gave back to a charity, but rather the practises employed by the company to limit the impact on the environment. I have been thinking about this in terms of post facilities and am eagerly awaiting a one to take the plunge. Tapeless workflow, paperless production flow, energy saving initiatives (god knows we use enough of it in the industry). These combined with efforts to be carbon neutral are the stories that would wow me.

10 October, 2006

Tony & David Sitting In A Tree

Great piece from BBC2 Time Trumpet which shows how similar are two parties have become. This is a skilful example of editorial pace and cadence.

Guess What: Google Bought YouTube

In case you are under a rock Google bought YouTube for a few bob. If your Mark Cuban, your laughing your arse off. If you’re a share holder, you should probably be a bit weary of a lead balloon. The NY Times starts by saying “A profitless Web site started by three 20-somethings after a late-night dinner party is sold for more than a billion dollars, instantly turning dozens of its employees into paper millionaires. It sounds like a tale from the late 1990’s dot-com bubble, but it happened yesterday.” Cuban laments the impact this may have on DRM an issue discussed in the last post about Brightcove. And with Apple in bed with Google it all seems a bit more interesting for the consumer, and not necessarily in a good way. Cuban finishes by saying rather bluntly, “Am I surprised, by the Google YT deal. Yes. Does it open up a whole new world if they go liability free? You have no idea.”

Brightcove Slags off iTV In Favor Of XBox 360

Following Apple’s announcement of iTV, Brightcove Chairman JeremyAllaire wrote a rather scathing review of the product. Brightcove is very much an advocate of open source competition in the internet video distribution market. In his blog he wrote:

It's great to see Apple starting to focus on the living room, emulating some of Microsoft's work over the past two years.  It will be interesting to see whether consumers are willing to spend $299 for a wireless media bridge, while they could also spend $299 and get a game/home entertainment platform, DVD player, and wireless media bridge all in one with the XBox 360.
This, of course, begs the much larger question of whether open platforms for digital media will win over the closed platform approach that Apple has taken.  Apple tightly controls their device, media formats / DRM, and retail distribution.  No one can create their own web-based services to target the device, the DRM format is closed, and to get monetized distribution through iTunes you need to directly negotiate a deal with Apple.
On the other hand, Microsoft has offered up a dramatically more open strategy -- anyone can make a device compatible with their formats and DRM (the DRM format can be licensed cheap and there are C and Linux implementations), anyone can build a media service that works with both.  And they offer up best of breed devices that have a shot at transforming the living room -- I like the XBox 360 as a living-room hub more than the 'iTV', which feels to me more like the various wireless media extenders that have languished in retail outlets.

I personally feel there is to date no product that really offers an effective internet to TV bridge. Similarly, video content is not of a standard suitable to send over to the TV. I don’t care what people say. It is just not good enough yet. There is still all to play for in this game. I hope Brightcove do well as they have a really decent business philosophy and a good service/product. But history shows that doesn’t always lead to product success. Brand proliferation is by and large the biggest factor.

Little Frog Plays With New Features In The Kona 3, And I Rant About Producers Doing Post Work In-House

Shane Ross (little frog in high def) has written a decent blow by blow of editing DVCPro HD over firewire and via the Kona 3 and Kona 2. The Kona 3 has added features of up converting and cross converting HD for multiple delivery requirements. This is of huge importance as more and more HD productions are co-productions Jane Eyre on BBC 1 at the moment is a co production with WGBH Boston. Similarly Rome sees BBC and HBO in bed together. At the moment at work I too am looking at BBC and Discovery co-productions. Not too long ago Nuremburg aired on BBC 2. For Nuremburg the producers were required to deliver 18 masters for the 3 part series. That is 6 different versions of each film. These included Textless and Texted UK TX, Discovery and Worldwide versions. This is an ever-growing issue, one which Post houses need to brace themselves for. In the end, Shane uses a workflow that I have seen a number of times: rendering an uncompressed 10 bit 1080 QT for colour correcting and vfx. I imagine Aja do better conversions than FCP, so choosing to export via the Kona 3 at 1080 is probably a good move.  Had the original workflow been adopted to use the Kona to do a frame rate conversion, I would begin to worry. Their tests seem to have been a success but I wonder if it really will hold up in real world practise.

BBC Post in London is buying the New £90K Snell and Wilcox Alchemist Platinum as it is ‘the only HD cross converter worth using’. According to the folks here, there is no converter on the market which utilises comparative motion estimation technology. Frame rates conversions can look so dire we have them a lot in the UK for US commercials and they are bloody awful. I would like to hear first hand what people think about the quality of ‘bang for your buck’ conversion hardware is.  It is great that we have these tools, but is it wiser to use the best available in certain situations?

Now for my rant about in house editing:

Continuing on from my statement above about ever increasingly complicated delivery requirements, at the moment there is a culture which is moving the editorial onus onto the producers.  I fear for the poor sod sitting on an FCP trying to get out a broadcast master with no broadcast technical experience and no engineers to help when it all goes tits up. Producers must be asking if this is what they signed on for!? Yeah, the concept is great. Save money and have the flexibility to make the film they want. But the technical aggravation combined with the lack of support makes the savings hardly worth it. Cleaver Producers will utilise this new responsibility with an air of caution. They can use this to their benefit as well, but only by knowing their limitations and how to shift responsibility. Post houses can benefit too. A clever producer in today’s market would look seriously at the following workflow:

  1. Consult post house.

  2. Shoot.

  3. Deliver rushes to post house for digitising.

  4. Take away firewire drive with formatted rushes and project file.

  5. Offline in house.

  6. Deliver cut film to post house .

  7. Post house does Conform, Online, Grade and Dub.

This may seem straight forward or perhaps not really saving money. Whatever. In my mind this is the clearest and best way as a producer to eliminate blame from yourself, satisfy the cost saving requirement (thousands by offlining in house), and ensure the best is achieved for the production technically and creatively. The post house will be pleased as well because the finishing is where the lion share of profit against time is. Post houses lose money on offline editing. They make up for it on digitising and creative staff. Offline suites are a loss leader. Take it away. Do it yourself. It saves production money and help your post house be more cost effective in their operations which may save you money as well.

Now, producers may say ‘I pretty much do that anyway’. You don’t do it though. Most of you fuck up on the important bit. You go off and digitise yourself. What happens is you fuck up your file structure and poorly manage your media and the conform takes twice as long, eating up half the money you save not to mention causing aggravation to all those involved and delaying the rest of your final post. Some producers even go one step further and try to playout their own masters and suffer the cost of failing tech review repeatedly.

I will say there are producers out there who can manage DIY post. But from where I sit the majority of producers I work with should not be lumbered with this responsibility.

09 October, 2006

Martin Scorsese's student film

I saw this linked on Nerve. I am reserving judgement, please tell me what you think:

Where I've Been + Robin Hood & Volver

Sorry for not Blogging last week much. I have been laaaazy. Not true. Been busy I finally got a chance to see Volver at the Curzon Soho on Sun. Love the theatre, overpriced at £9.50. But the café and the film made up for it, not to mention they had the England game projected on to the wall in the foyer.

Back to Volver, I have rarely watched a film and come away feeling it was perfect. I am uber critical of films. Not because I am high and mighty, it was a combination of a chef father (Picture a German Gordon Ramsey), studying acting, but abandoning it because actors suck, and a film Studies degree that cumulatively gave me a critical eye. I digress. Volver, in my opinion is perfect. Bad Education and Almodovar’s other films have similar themes (abuse, relationships, sexual identity, figures of authority), but here he has captured a truth within a highly stylized story with eccentric characters that few of his contemporaries could achieve. For me, it is how Almodovar deals with his task the weight he uses to paint each stroke of characterisation. I can’t dwell, must move on because I can’t poss do the film justice with out properly dissecting it.

I thought I wouldn’t like it so much, while watching it I thought I would be annoyed by the man hating. I was not. I thought I would be annoyed by Penelope’s bulging tit’s, I was not.(not what you think, it was the occasional piss take in the banter between the sisters that made the it ok). Loads of other obstacles were perfectly addressed by Almodovar which made the film such a success for me.




Unfortunately, I went from this to Robin Hood on Sunday. I say unfortunately because BBC1’s Robin Hood is good, but would never hold a candle to what I think is the best film of the year. Never the less, it was an achievement. My wife, Charlie, was pleased to see the beeb continuing in the vein of Doctor Who, creating high quality, high budget family shows. Johnathon Ross, in his documentary about the history of Robin productions praised the production for creating an engrossing version of Robin for a new generation.

Technically, the production is good. High standards in filming and post work (all HD). I cant help but say it was a bit self indulgent, with the jump zooms, whip pans and similar.



03 October, 2006

Cinema Tech's Scott Kirsner interviews Jonathan Rothbart and Stu Maschwitz

Scott Kirsner has a great conversation with Stu Maschwitz and Jonathan Rothbart, two of the three that started the SF based effects company The Orphanage.  Stu writes Pro Lost, a blog with great, if infrequent tid bits of knowledge. He has also been busy writing a book: The DV Rebel's Guide: An All-Digital Approach to Making Killer Action Movies on the Cheap.  

I read this long but engrossing interview on the train home last night, and would recommend it to anyone. Scott is a strong interviewer and really gets a lot from these passionate guys at the peak of the industry. Key themes I found interesting are: (Italics have been paraphrased from the interview)

On The VFX / Animation Industry
Orphanage are looking to develop a Feature Animation side to the industry and discuss the convergence and differences between VFX and Animation. One key difference is the way animation relies on similar detail levels as the very realistic needs in VFX, but implores a stylization to take it way from ‘the real’. Stu refers to the ‘Uncanny Valley’ where in Animation the more realistic the better up to a certain point after which it becomes ‘really creepy’.

Jurassic Park: 35 CG Shots
Superman: 1500 CG Shots
Things are continually pushing creative and computer boundaries.
This is right across the board from big houses to small ones. People are expecting a laptop to do amazing things in Motion or FCP. In Post we play a game of offering more service and are constantly on the edge of the technology released.

There is an emerging trend of trading cityscapes. Superman Sydney >NYC. XMan 3 in SF with no shoots in the city, only plates.

On the impact of You Tube, Tivo on the Commercials Industry
Scott asked if Tivo has manifested a culture whereby if the commercial is not big and flash to grab the viewer, they just fast forward.
Stu answered that the goal at the moment is to create commercials that ‘people will  want to point it out on You Tube’.

On Circumventing the Distribution industry
See Four Eyed Monsters
Which screened at Slamdance, where I did my post university internship!

Here is an interesting business model:
Screen the film in free 10 min chunks with the option to pay to get ahead in the story.
A good example of similar tactics here in Britain, channel 4 has ‘First Look’ and BBC does the same. To explain by example, last night I was watch Spooks. When it finished, they promoted seeing the next episode shortly after on BBC3. C4 does this with Hollyoaks on E4. What this does is not only get people to continue watching the show, but drives post prime time traffic to multichannels (Increasing ratings in this fragile market) and maximises opportunity to see.

HD DVD v Blu Ray
Both have missed the boat. Netflix over ip will win. Why? People cant be bothered to buy a new format. HD Content over ip is just around the corner.

One of my fav stories:
“We get a reminder sometimes that we can kind of outsmart ourselves. With “Sin City,” we had a bunch of splattering blood we were trying to do. After two weeks of fluid dynamics development of splattering blood, the guy who was putting the final shot together and the CG supervisor said, “We just need some reference for what this should look like.” They went out in the parking lot with a bowl of milk, and started splashing it. The milk was white enough that they could get a good key off of it, so the compositor put that in the shot, just to see how it might play. He put it in dailies, and we all said, “That’s the best fluid simulation we’ve ever seen.” That afternoon, we were out in the parking lot with a bowl full of eggnog – this was around Christmas -- and a hockey puck. Throwing a hockey puck into a bowl of eggnog became how we splattered the Yellow Bastard’s blood all over the barn at the end of “Sin City.”

Other discussions included:
UGC/Remix Culture. How much is the audience affecting the content they watch.

The manner in which the Studios try to mould video games often unsuccessfully around feature films. These are very different cultural pieces that require different modes of viewer interaction and therefore demand different development practises if they are to be successful.

The importance of Previz. How to use it to pitch.

And much more!
Go have a read, but remember, there is a lot of reading!


02 October, 2006

BBC's New Idents

The BBC rebrands around the idea of the circle.
7 New idents.
international shoot including Mexico City and Coatia
Budget 1.2Million.
Red Bee is laughign all thw way to the bank.

Setting Up a High-Definition TV Isn't for Sissies

Quite funny article in the vein of flat pack furniture building. It takes a real man to purchase and set up an HD TV!
The images coming through TiVo looked horrendous. I quickly figured out how to change the aspect ratio from the native 16:9 to a standard TV-friendly 4:3.
That introduced two huge gray bars on either side of the image and improved the image a bit, but not much. My children sat on the couch behind me, aghast.
"It's official: I hate this TV," my son deadpanned.
My wife looked at the image and then at me, then back at the image. I stared down at the manual I had just flipped open.
"I'm working on it," I said tersely.
I tried switching inputs to the direct cable connection to see if that helped. Initially it did nothing — I couldn't even get a signal — but it turns out that was my fault.

TV Room uses Metadata to Assist in Programme selection


An Aussie research company has developed T-Visionarium II, a room which is surrounded by 360 degree video screens standing 11 feet high. Displayed by 12 projectors, split to the right and left eyes, the viewer can choose between 22,000 programmes by pointing and clicking on the desired image with a ‘high tech remote control’. The really interesting thing is the use of meta data which lines up other programmes in the background based on the viewers selection behaviour. Perhaps this more than the room, will evolve to be incorporated in the ever-growing expanse of multichannel and Internet TV.


FREE Hit Counters!